26
Nov

Why Daniel?

   Posted by: michy   in General

I can never understand at first why the producers of Casino Royale decided to take Daniel Craig to play the new James Bond.  I mean for starters, he is too rugged looking, not as good looking as Pierce Brosnan and Sean Connery and not as refined too.  Yes, I am not a Daniel Craig fan and yes I did not watch Casino Royale in the movies as a protest. Hehehe…  But then when I was browsing the web, I run into an article about the Casino Royale novel that Ian Flemming wrote.  It turned out, Casino Royale is the first James Bond novel that Ian Flemming wrote for the James Bond series.  This is where everything started.  This is where 007 earned his license to kill and the first time he started using the name James Bond.  Now, I understand why they got someone who is not as refined as the previous James Bond stars.  For, he was just a newbie in this movie and they needed someone who is not as sophisticated as those who preceded him.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 26th, 2008 at 5:20 am and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 comments so far

 1 

I agree… I think these last two bond movies weren’t exactly the best so far. He’s to edgey and not refined

November 26th, 2008 at 5:47 am
 2 

@patty -correct… but i guess that’s what they have in mind.

michys last blog post..Why Daniel?

November 26th, 2008 at 6:43 am
 3 

In my opinion, Craig is the best Bond after Sean Connery. :)
nestes last blog post..Wordpress skips 2.6.4 for 2.6.5

November 29th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
 4 

@neste well, i like pierce more though…

michys last blog post..Home Bound

December 2nd, 2008 at 10:34 am